The prologue is very well done, and it makes you feel like you’re playing a game of consequence. I only wish that the game was better executed. I’m happy to say that diversity didn’t mess up this game. That’s what I did in playing it for the past week. That’s a shame, as everybody should give this game a fair shake. I don’t think this game will be as popular as some other titles like Call of Duty: Black Ops 4 or Red Dead Redemption 2. But DICE rightly responded that playable female characters “ are here to stay.” Sadly, it felt like Battlefield V never really recovered its footing from the initial negative reaction, as if gamers were determined to ignore it. Some of those things disappeared in the final version of the game. Other players also grumbled about seeing black soldiers in the war. They also reacted negatively to the body tattoos and a prosthetic arm that one character had in the reveal trailer, saying they were anachronisms. Some players didn’t like a female soldier on the cover, noting how it was so rare in real history. The approach - where the emphasis is on telling us gritty and not glorified stories about people we didn’t know were part of history - made the experience of war feel both fresh and real.įair or not, the welcome decision to embrace Battlefield’s own historical roots in WWII was overshadowed by the negative initial reaction gamers had when DICE showed off one of the new game’s selling points: diversity. It is a fitting continuation of the approach that DICE took with 2016’s memorable Battlefield 1. In an era where video games teach our young folks more history, Battlefield V’s mostly accurate and respectful look at World War II is refreshing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |